The topic is ” how to tame a wilde Tongue ” by Gloria Anzaldua. One sentence that stood out for me is “So, if you really want to hurt me, talk about my language”.
Story/Passage “How to Tame a Wild Tongue” by Gloria Anzaldua in the book “Ways of Reading”. We will write an essay where we mix personal and academic writing to convey an overarching theme, message or argument. Again, I am asking that you create arrangement based on an intentional method of organization, designed by you. Your subject for argument, however, is of your choosing. Likewise the Narrative moves you to make are also your own.
It’s a 5 paragraph essay that talks about the three charges of King Louis. The first paragraph should talk about the introduction of the three charges and the second one should be about the 1st charge and the third one should be about the 2nd charge and the 4th one should be about the 3rd charge which is the last charge. Lastly the conclusion to the three charges of King Louis. I need you to cite notations for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th paragraph. Each paragraph should be 5-6 sentences. I need you to put the page number of where you got the information from and do not plagiarism please. Please have it in MLA format, and King louis was accused for various crimes of the people in France, his charges include 1, supporting unfair system of government that takes away rights from the citizens of his country, and 2, wasting tax dollars for his personal life and unnecessary rights and 3, hate crimes and discrimination against the Huguenots. And lastly is should be done in MLA format. I have attached a powerpoint on what the essay should be about. Please follow it.
Absolutely no plagiarism, must be original and very thorough. Please make sure everything is followed in the question and the grading rubric. Assigned articles are attached, please also use at least one other outside academic resource for question #2. Must include in-text citations. Must include specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. No cover page needed but the questions should be separate. Please provide short but thorough sentences.
Supporting material: Attached
Question #1:
Case Discussion
This discussion will be split into three parts. We will discuss implementation of regulations,strategies for compliance, and cost consideration of the proposed legislation. Please look for the faculty’s lead question for each topic and reply to each. In addition to addressing the faculty’s lead question, please respond to your colleagues’ comments.
How do you expect the incumbent taxi operators to respond to the Uber’s entry into D.C?
Here is the question on cost consideration of the proposed legislation:
What should Uber do in the face of the proposed D.C. legislation?
Important note: You do not need to use outside reference for this discussion! Use those readings assigned to you for the course will be sufficient.
Question #2:
From the perspective of compliance and risk management, how would you apply what you have learned and researched in this course to improve compliance within an organization? Your response must include, but not limited to, issues on the culture, enforcement, and costs of noncompliance.
Please see grading rubric below. This assignment should be at least 4-5 paragraphs each and very thorough. Make sure you integrate real-life applications to support key points.
Case Discussion Rubric (2016)
Case Discussion Rubric (2016)
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Initial Posting
Initial response displays an excellent understanding of the assigned case, the course readings, and the underlying concepts and includes the correct use of relevant terminology. Initial response additionally integrates specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. Initial response is clear, concise, and compelling.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics
Entirely free of mechanical errors. These include: grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting (font style and size).
As a clinical social worker, it is important to understand group typology in order to choose the appropriate group method for a specific population or problem. Each type of group has its own approach and purpose. Two of the more frequently used types of groups are task groups and intervention groups.
For this Assignment, review the “Cortez Multimedia” case study, and identify a target behavior or issue that needs to be ameliorated, decreased, or increased. In a 2- to 4-page report, complete the following:
Identify the model of treatment group (i.e., support, education, teams, or treatment conferences).
Using the typologies described in the Toseland & Rivas (2017) piece, describe the characteristics of your group. For instance, if you choose a treatment group that is a support group, what would be the purpose, leadership, focus, bond, composition, and communication?
Include the advantages and disadvantages of using this type of group as an intervention.
Reference: Please Use the Following
Toseland, R. W., & Rivas, R. F. (2017). An introduction to group work practice (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Himalhoch, S., Medoff, D. R., & Oyeniyi, G. (2007). Efficacy of group psychotherapy to reduce depressive symptoms among HIV-infected individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 21(10), 732–739.
Lasky, G. B., & Riva, M. T. (2006). Confidentiality and privileged communication in group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 56(4), 455–47
Toseland, R. W., & Rivas, R. F. (2017). An introduction to group work practice (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
