Ethics, Politics, and Economics of Policy Assignment

Ethics, Politics, and Economics of Policy Assignment

There are many influences when a policy is being considered. Economical, ethical, and political issues are faced by executives and politicians, who are influenced by lobbyists and others who have a concerted interest in the success or failure of the policy.

Write a two-to three-page letter on one of the following prompts, taking one of the perspectives as below, speaking in that designated voice, keeping in mind financial concerns, ethical and social issues and the human factor.

  • As the aid to the governor of your state, you are preparing her speech to outline the economic, ethical, and political aspects of the issue of providing undocumented workers with worker’s compensation as a requirement for employment.
  • As the Chief Financial Officer of a state funded hospital you are writing to the governor lobbying him on the issue of providing undocumented workers with healthcare access when injured as your hospital is now absorbing all costs.
Your letter should be written following current APA style guidelines.

Ethics, Politics, and Economics of Policy Assignment Rubric

M3 Ethics, Politics, and Economics of Policy Assignment Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocused Topic: Ethics, Politics and Economics of Occupational Policy
18.75 to >16.85 ptsA

Student clearly and thoroughly addresses and convinces, in letter format and in the correct perspective, the primary issue of providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers.

16.85 to >14.98 ptsB

Student adequately addresses and convinces, in letter format and in the correct perspective, the primary issue of providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers. 1-2 elements may be overlooked or additional detail would be beneficial.

14.98 to >13.1 ptsC

Student addresses only a few elements, in letter format and in the correct perspective, the primary issue of providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers.

13.1 to >0 ptsF

Student does not address the primary issue of providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers, or the elements described are unclear or inaccurate.

18.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
18.75 to >16.85 ptsA

Student clearly articulates a thorough analysis of the various key points in providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers.

16.85 to >14.98 ptsB

Student adequately analyzes the various key points in providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers; 1-2 elements may be overlooked, or additional detail would be beneficial.

14.98 to >13.1 ptsC

Student addresses only a few elements in their analysis of the various key points in providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers; lacks a demonstration of critical thinking.

13.1 to >0 ptsF

Student does not show an understanding of analysis of the various key points in providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers, or the elements described are unclear or inaccurate.

18.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence and Support
18.75 to >16.85 ptsA

Student clearly articulates a thorough examination of the evidence related to the topic through various and current examples

16.85 to >14.98 ptsB

Student provides an examination of the evidence related to the topic through various and current examples; could benefit from additional detail.

14.98 to >13.1 ptsC

Student provides examination of only a few elements of the evidence related to related to the topic through various and current examples; lacks a demonstration of critical thinking.

13.1 to >0 ptsF

Student fails to examine any elements of the evidence related to related to the topic and does not provide current examples, or the examples provided do not make sense in the context of the examination.

18.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Writing
7.5 to >6.74 ptsA

Writing demonstrates attention to logic and reasoning of points; writing is unified and clearly leads the reader through the points presented. Writing is of high quality and in scholarly tone and has high quality references.

6.74 to >5.99 ptsB

Writing is coherent and logically organized, although somewhat wordy in places. Writing has some errors but is adequate and maintains scholarly tone and high quality references.

5.99 to >5.24 ptsC

Writing is coherent and logically organized, although some points may stray from the topic, and some passages are unnecessarily wordy. Writing is of lower quality but still has some scholarly elements and /or lower quality references.

5.24 to >0 ptsF

Writing is disorganized and difficult to follow, may be unnecessarily wordy. Writing is of poor quality and/or not written in scholarly tone and/or uses poor quality references.

7.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat (APA, Spelling, Grammar, Length)
11.25 to >10.11 ptsA

Entry meets length requirements with no errors in APA format, spelling, or grammar

10.11 to >8.98 ptsB

Entry meets length requirements with only a few minimal errors in APA format, spelling, and/or grammar; these errors do not detract from the readability of the entry

8.98 to >7.86 ptsC

Entry meets length requirements with several errors in APA format, spelling, and/or grammar; spell-check and grammar-check is recommended to help catch these errors

7.86 to >0 ptsF

Entry does not meet length requirements, and/or has extensive errors in APA format, spelling, and/or grammar; use of the University Writing Center is highly recommended

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Rating*

Scroll to Top