Morality Reflection
Egoism is a broad ethical doctrine that claims moral decisions are (and, in some cases, should be) made in self-interest. At the opposite end of the spectrum would be Altruism (also sometimes called benevolence), which states that decisions can (and, in some cases should) be completely selfless. Hobbes argues that even apparently altruistic acts can be viewed through egoism (as selfish) in that a person may gain a good feeling or some other benefit by helping others. His opponents would argue that this is a pessimistic or negative worldview. What do you think? Do you believe moral decisions/actions can be selfless? Or are all of our decision made with at least some self-interest in mind? Whatever your opinion, explain your reasoning.
Requirements: 200 Words
Answer preview
Thomas Hobbes is a philosopher who endorsed psychological egoism, emphasizing that people make moral decisions to satisfy self-interests. On the other hand, altruism disputes Hobbes’s philosophy, citing that people’s moral decisions can be selfless. In support of the altruistic view, I believe that decisions/actions can be selfless because this promotes the ethical principles of benevolence. I feel human beings use their instincts to engage in acts or make decisions that prevent harm. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2020), altruistic behaviors do not involve self-sacrifice; instead, the desire to benefit others encourages
245 Words
