Today is your presidential Inauguration Day. You were elected as president last November by a slim margin in both the popular vote and the electoral vote. You attended a worship service this morning with your family and about a dozen high-ranking members of the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate. Then, you and the current president took a ride in a convertible car to the U.S. Capitol, where you were sworn in as the new president of the United States. It is now official; you are the president!
As you and your family are enjoying the parade, your new chief of staff and one of the key military advisors who is a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff whispers to you that there has been a major cyberattack on key federal financial institutions across the United States that compromised the personal financial data and passwords of hundreds of thousands of citizens.
Even though you have held office for just a few hours, you know it is critical to act swiftly and decisively so that the perpetrators of the crime, the American citizens, and political leaders (those who support you and those who do not) see you as a competent and strong leader. What are your first three actions?
In your paper, you will describe these three actions in detail. Organization is important in this paper. Make certain to include the following information in your paper and organize major sections using headings.
Briefly describe the cyberattack and its implications for the nation.
This section should be located early in the paper (i.e., in the first or second paragraph).
Why is this action your third? Why is it so important?
What is the goal of the action? What purpose does it serve?
What individuals, groups, or organizations does it involve?
Provide a conclusion.
What are your next steps?
Briefly describe how your actions were limited by the U.S. Constitution. For example, you may feel constrained by the other two branches—powers denied to you by the U.S. Constitution or law (e.g., declaring war or appointing to key positions in your administration loyal and trusted friends without going through the formal appointment process or the civil services system).
Your paper must be 2–4 pages in length, not counting the title page and references page. Make certain to double-space, apply 1-inch margins, and use 12-point font. Utilize headings to separate major sections of your plan (e.g., First Action, Section Action). Cite all sources in-text and on the references page using APA Style.
The following resources may be helpful as you complete the assignment. As aforementioned, make certain to cite all sources—in-text and on the references page—that you use to support your work.
In a 6-8 page paper, analyze a General Patton’s performance in the Battle of the Bulge. This analysis should evaluate how effectively or ineffectively the commander executed 4 of the 7 mission command principles: competence, mutual trust, shared understanding, commander’s intent, mission orders, discipline initiative, and risk acceptance. Discuss how the command’s use those principles affected the battle’s outcome.
Summary of the battle should be very brief. Aside from the introduction paragraph, limited to one paragraph total for background information of the commander.
Minimum of 5 scholarly sources- cite all sources according to Chicago style (endnotes and bibliography)
Provide a powerpoint no more than 12 slides based paper.
The above information for the battle and commander General Patton assessment on 4 of the 7 principles listed
4 of the 7 principles that are need are located in this PDF.
(1000 – 1250 words): Students compose an essay outlining their position,
History Question
position essay.
(1000 – 1250 words): Students compose an essay outlining their position, attitude or intention towards the specified topic. The student’s position must be clearly identified, discussed and supported with evidence from reliable sources. The student must take a position that applies belief and reasoningsystems to concepts of ethics and/or knowledge (DBR 200.1) and applies said systems of knowledge and/or ethics to issues in society, history, faith, spirituality, and/or one’s own life from a global perspective (DBR 200.2).
So-for this specific assignment-students will use one of the first three discussion topics as described generally below: (Discussion Four to make an argument about the ethics of using AI’s to supplement/replace human friendships!)
Disc 4-Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethic (the ethical limits of friendship and technology)-argue whether technology undermines human relations-especially friendships-or can augment or improve them using Aristotelian ethics as the measure of good or useful or perfect friendships
Requirements: 1000-1250 words
To cite the main reading this chapter:
Ross, W. D. (Trans.) (2018). Nicomachean ethics. In M. Lewis & T. Ferstle (Eds.), Dialogues of belief and reason level 200 (3rd ed., pp. 172-179). Lynn University Digital Press. (Original work published ca. 350 B.C.E.)
In-text citation: (Ross, ca. 350 B.C.E./2018, p. __)
For Milestone Two, you will explain the research design and methods that will be used to address the busi
For Milestone Two, you will explain the research design and methods that will be used to address the business problem you identified in Milestone One, justifying why they are appropriate for your research study. To support your research design, describe the methods you will use, the key variables, and ethical considerations involved in using the research design.
IMPORTANT: You should provide tables and draw graphs to show trends from MARUTI SUZUKI case study. Please review Rubric elements and all postings provided in the announcements.
RESUBMIT by Sunday. It will be graded at a reduced level.Dr. Amaria
Research Design: Research Design and Methods: You have partially explained with justification the research design and methods that will be used for the study. More Analysis needed using Maruti Suzuki India case study Exhibits.
Research Design: Variables: Some key variables from the data sources were identified that are to be used to analyze the research problem. More Analysis needed using Maruti Suzuki India case study Exhibits.
Research Design: Dependent and Independent Variables: The dependent and independent variables are partially explained. More Analysis needed using Maruti Suzuki India case study Exhibits.
Research Design: Ethical Considerations: Some key ethical issues were explained based on the available data sources, including issues of legal and professional standards. More Analysis needed using Maruti Suzuki India case study Exhibits.
Articulation of Response: Overall, you provided satisfactory remarks about the qualitative analysis of the Maruti Suzuki case study. Your analysis added partial value and made some contributions. Appreciate sharing your thoughts describing the data tables and how your analysis helps in answering the Maruti research questions.
Let me know if you have questions. Write more analysis for each Rubric element.